[compress] differences in implementation of Zip ibm vs. oracle?
Over on https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275, a user submitted two .xlsx files generated with Apache POI, one by IBM's jvm and one by Oracle's jvm. The file generated with Oracle's jvm opens without issue; however, MSOffice complains but can fix the file generated by IBM's jvm. Winzip opens both without complaining.
Does this ring a bell? Have you seen this before? Anything we can do on our (POI's) side to fix this?