3.17.1?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

3.17.1?

Allison, Timothy B.
--- Comment #1 from Javen O'Neal <[hidden email]> --- Sounds like a 3.17.1 might be in order.

+1

What do you all think?

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 5:23 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Bug 61564] Illegal reflective access by org.apache.poi.util.DocumentHelper in Java 9

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61564

Javen O'Neal <[hidden email]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 OS|                            |All

--- Comment #1 from Javen O'Neal <[hidden email]> --- Sounds like a 3.17.1 might be in order.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3.17.1?

pj.fanning
We could just call it 3.18.



--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3.17.1?

kiwiwings
If you can wait for another week, I'll take care of merging and releasing a 3.17.1 ... which is basically my current $dayjob ... -.-
Please decide which issues you want to have in.

Andi



signature.asc (495 bytes) Download Attachment